Home
Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-Reviewed • ISSN: 2582-9394 • Fast-Track Publishing • Impact Factor 8.5 • Low Publication Charges • Crossref DOI Linking

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Research and review articles are invited for publication in September - October 2026 (Volume 18, Issue 1) Submit manuscript

Quality assurance metrics and lean management interventions for reducing errors in high-volume hospital blood culture processing

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Quality assurance metrics and lean management interventions for reducing errors in high-volume hospital blood culture processing

Alfred Kusi Appiah *

St. Mary’s Regional Hospital, Grand Junction, Colorado, USA.

Review Article
Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 16(02), 228-236
Article DOI: 10.30574/msarr.2026.16.2.0058
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2026.16.2.0058

Received on 06 March 2026; revised on 15 April 2026; accepted on 17 April 2026

Bloodstream infections remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide with blood cultures serving as the diagnostic gold standard. However, in high-volume hospital settings, the reliability of blood culture results is frequently compromised by pre-analytical and analytical errors including blood culture contamination. This narrative review synthesizes evidence published between 2020 and 2025 on quality assurance (QA) metrics and Lean management interventions aimed at reducing errors in high-throughput blood culture processing. Core QA indicators like contamination rates, blood volume adequacy and utilization rates are examined as foundational tools for monitoring performance and guiding improvement. The integration of these approaches creates a feedback loop whereby data-driven measurement informs systematic intervention and improvement outcomes against established benchmarks. Emerging technologies such as blood culture diversion devices, automated laboratory systems, and standardized collection kits, demonstrate promise in augmenting these efforts. Multimodal interventions combining standardized protocols with targeted staff training consistently reduced contamination rates across diverse clinical settings. Inadequate blood volume collection with mean volumes as low as 4.5 mL in some hematology wards significantly compromise diagnostic sensitivity. The review highlights the value of integrating QA metrics with Lean methodologies that support sustained quality improvement. Persistent gaps remain in long-term sustainability, economic evaluation, human factors research and standardization across healthcare systems. Addressing these gaps is essential to improving diagnostic accuracy, antimicrobial stewardship and healthcare efficiency.

Turnaround time; Blood culture contamination; Lean Six Sigma; Indicator; Optimization

https://msarr.magnascientiapub.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/MSARR-2026-…

Preview Article PDF

Alfred Kusi Appiah. Quality assurance metrics and lean management interventions for reducing errors in high-volume hospital blood culture processing. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 16(02), 228-236. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2026.16.2.0058

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution