Home
Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-Reviewed • ISSN: 2582-9394 • Fast-Track Publishing • Impact Factor 8.5 • Low Publication Charges • Crossref DOI Linking

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Research and review articles are invited for publication in September - October 2026 (Volume 18, Issue 1) Submit manuscript

Outcomes comparison of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who treated with combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel with other regimens: A systematic review

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Outcomes comparison of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who treated with combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel with other regimens: A systematic review

Raditya Maulana Akbar 1, * and Rosa Falerina 2

1 Medical Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Review Article
Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 11(02), 358-364
Article DOI: 10.30574/msarr.2024.11.2.0126
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.11.2.0126
Received on 22 June 2024; revised on 29 July 2024; accepted on 01 August 2024
Background: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is among the top five cancers, with the highest number in Indonesia. One of the treatments for NPC is chemotherapy. The most common regimen used at Airlangga University Hospital, Surabaya, is a combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel. This study aims to assess the difference in outcomes of NPC patients who are given a combination therapy of carboplatin and paclitaxel with the outcomes of patients who are given regimen therapy other than the combination of the two drugs.
Methods: This study is a systematic review using PRISMA guidelines. Articles used were taken from e-databases, PubMed and Cochrane. The inclusion criteria used were articles that showed the outcomes of NPC patients who received carboplatin and paclitaxel combination therapy compared with other regimens.
Results: This study included one research journal that met the criteria. The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel could reduce serious adverse events by 84% compared to the 3-drug combination. Based on progression-free survival (PFS), the 3-drugs combination showed better results (median: 7.5 months) compared to the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel (median: 6.5 months).
Conclusion: Results showed that the overall outcome of patients treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel combination was not better than those treated with a 3-drug combination of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab. However, the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel had minimal side effects compared to those given the combination of the three drugs.
Paclitaxel; Carboplatin; NPC; Treatment
https://msarr.magnascientiapub.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/MSARR-2024-…

Preview Article PDF

Raditya Maulana Akbar and Rosa Falerina. Outcomes comparison of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who treated with combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel with other regimens: A systematic review. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 11(2), 358-364. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.11.2.0126

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution