Home
Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-Reviewed • ISSN: 2582-9394 • Fast-Track Publishing • Impact Factor 8.5 • Low Publication Charges • Crossref DOI Linking

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Research and review articles are invited for publication in September - October 2026 (Volume 18, Issue 1) Submit manuscript

Mixing lint grades in relation to fiber and yarn quality of Egyptian cotton

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Mixing lint grades in relation to fiber and yarn quality of Egyptian cotton

Mona El-Sayed Shalaby *

Department of Cotton Grading (CGD), Cotton Research Institute (CRI), Agricultural Research Institute (ARC), Giza, Egypt.
Research Article
Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 11(02), 229-242
Article DOI: 10.30574/msarr.2024.11.2.0118
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.11.2.0118
Received on 15 June 2024; revised on 26 July 2024; accepted on 29 July 2024
This study was undertaken to investigate the effect of different mixing percentages of lint grades of Egyptian cotton varieties on fiber properties and yarn strength. Two lint grades within each variety of four Egyptian cottons from 2022 and 2023 crop seasons were used; Good to Fully Good (G/FG) and Fully Good Fair (FGF) for Giza 86, Good to Fully Good (G/FG) and Fully Good Fair to Good (FGF/G) for Giza 92, Good to Fully Good (G/FG) and Good Fair (GF) for Giza 94 and, Fully Good (FG) and Fully Good Fair (FGF) for Giza 95 with mixing percentage (30%-40%-50%) of the highest grades for each variety. Mixed lots of lint cotton grades were tested on Fiber Classifying System (FCS) instrument to measure fiber properties. Yarn strength was tested on Good Brand Lea tester at 60s and 3.6 twist factor. This experiment was conducted at Egyptian & International Cotton Classification Center (EICCC) in Cotton Research Institute (CRI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Giza, Egypt. Using traditional statistical analysis (normal probability distribution) with untraditional method (assumed probability distribution) illustrated that; It was remarkably increased upper half mean length,mean length, uniformity index, fiber strength, micronaire reading, maturity and linear density with increase of the percentage of the highest grade in the mixing for each studied variety. Meanwhile short fiber content showed the opposite trend, whereas, elongation had no obvious trend. Prominent improvement in yarn strength was observed when the highest lint cotton grade percentage increased from 30% through 40% and 50% in the mixing lots. Yarn strength increased from 2690 to 3170, from 2475 to 2850, from 2440 to 2845 and from 2135 to 2360 for Giza 92, Giza 86, Giza 94 and Giza 95, respectively. Generally, mixing method based on lint grades exhibited significant improvement in fiber and yarn quality properties. In the same time this method is easier than the experimental mixing methods based on micronaire reading or fiber strength. on the other hand, it is very important process in cotton production economy.
Egyptian cotton grades; Mixing; Fiber properties; Yarn strength; Normal and assumed probability distribution
https://msarr.magnascientiapub.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/MSARR-2024-…

Preview Article PDF

Mona El-Sayed Shalaby. Mixing lint grades in relation to fiber and yarn quality of Egyptian cotton. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 11(2), 229-242. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.11.2.0118

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution