Home
Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-Reviewed • ISSN: 2582-9394 • Fast-Track Publishing • Impact Factor 8.5 • Low Publication Charges • Crossref DOI Linking

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Research and review articles are invited for publication in September - October 2026 (Volume 18, Issue 1) Submit manuscript

Medical Pluralism in Practice: A narrative review of community-based integration of indigenous healing traditions in U.S. healthcare settings

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Medical Pluralism in Practice: A narrative review of community-based integration of indigenous healing traditions in U.S. healthcare settings

Nancy Akomaniwaa Andoh *

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.

Review Article
Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 17(01), 058-065
Article DOI: 10.30574/msarr.2026.17.1.0073
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2026.17.1.0073

Received on 02 April 2026; revised on 09 May 2026; accepted on 11 May 2026

Medical pluralism remains a lived reality in many Indigenous communities, where people move between biomedical services and Indigenous healing traditions in ways that reflect culture, spirituality, history, and community-defined understandings of wellness. In U.S. healthcare settings, however, formal integration of Indigenous healing traditions remains limited, uneven, and often constrained by biomedical norms, weak policy recognition, and colonial structures that continue to shape health systems. This narrative review synthesizes the provided literature on community-based integration of Indigenous healing traditions, with a primary focus on implications for U.S. healthcare settings and with comparative lessons drawn from Canada, Australia, and broader Indigenous health scholarship. The review shows that integration works best when it is community-led, grounded in self-determination, supported by Elders and Knowledge Holders, and structured around holistic models of health rather than narrow disease-focused care. The evidence also points to persistent barriers, including racism, biomedical dominance, policy gaps, tokenistic inclusion, and attempts to make Indigenous healing conform to Western standards. The review identifies five convergent themes: the shift from biomedical exclusivity to holistic care; community governance as the foundation of integration; practical integration through ceremonies, traditional foods, cultural supports, and Indigenous practitioners; structural barriers within mainstream institutions; and the emergence of Indigenous frameworks such as the Medicine Wheel and nation-based determinants of health. A conceptual framework of community-governed medical pluralism is proposed to guide more respectful and effective integration in U.S. healthcare settings.

Medical pluralism; Indigenous healing; Community-based healthcare; U.S. healthcare; Traditional healing

https://msarr.magnascientiapub.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/MSARR-2026-…

Preview Article PDF

Nancy Akomaniwaa Andoh. Medical Pluralism in Practice: A narrative review of community-based integration of indigenous healing traditions in U.S. healthcare settings. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 17(01), 058-065. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2026.17.1.0073.

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution