Home
Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-Reviewed • ISSN: 2582-9394 • Fast-Track Publishing • Impact Factor 8.5 • Low Publication Charges • Crossref DOI Linking

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Research and review articles are invited for publication in September - October 2026 (Volume 18, Issue 1) Submit manuscript

Governance, risk, and compliance frameworks for AI Security: A review of emerging standards and challenges

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Governance, risk, and compliance frameworks for AI Security: A review of emerging standards and challenges

 Abimbola Filani 1 and Jochebed Akoto Opoku 2, *

1 Department of Information Technology (DIT), Trine University, IN, USA.
2 Department of Telecommunication Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

Review Article
 
Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 17(02), 030–040
Article DOI: 10.30574/msarr.2026.17.2.0120
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2026.17.2.0120

Received on 26 May 2026; revised on 30 June 2026; accepted on 02 July 2026

Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption is accelerating across industries, introducing novel governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) challenges that traditional cybersecurity frameworks cannot fully address. Standards such as ISO/IEC 27001 and the NIST Risk Management Framework safeguard IT assets but do not comprehensively mitigate AI-specific risks like adversarial attacks, model drift, and ethical concerns such as fairness and accountability. This gap raises critical questions about how organizations can govern AI responsibly while maintaining security and compliance. This paper reviews emerging AI-GRC frameworks and regulations, including the OECD AI Principles, ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, and the EU AI Act, alongside industry standards from Microsoft, Google, and IBM. Through comparative analysis, we examine how these frameworks address governance structures, risk assessment methodologies, compliance mechanisms, and transparency requirements. We also explore integration strategies with existing cybersecurity and enterprise risk models. Our findings reveal a fragmented ecosystem with overlapping principles but inconsistent enforcement and technical depth. While global standards emphasize values such as transparency and accountability, operational guidance on adversarial robustness and lifecycle risk monitoring remains limited. The review identifies best practices for embedding GRC into AI development pipelines, including continuous monitoring, documentation artifacts, and risk-tiering strategies. It also highlights gaps in interoperability, audit tooling, and liability regimes. This research speaks to policymakers, compliance officers, cybersecurity professionals, and AI developers seeking harmonized governance approaches. Future work should prioritize unified audit standards, empirical evaluation of governance effectiveness, and integration of AI risk metrics into ESG reporting to ensure trustworthy and sustainable AI deployment.

AI Governance; Adversarial attacks; Risk Management; Compliance; Transparency

https://msarr.magnascientiapub.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/MSARR-2026-…

Preview Article PDF

Abimbola Filani and Jochebed Akoto Opoku. Governance, risk, and compliance frameworks for AI Security: A review of emerging standards and challenges. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 17(02), 30–040. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2026.17.2.0120

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution