Home
Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-Reviewed • ISSN: 2582-9394 • Fast-Track Publishing • Impact Factor 8.5 • Low Publication Charges • Crossref DOI Linking

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Research and review articles are invited for publication in September - October 2026 (Volume 18, Issue 1) Submit manuscript

Comparative enzyme kinetics of catalase and dehydrogenase under municipal waste and CaO treatments in spent engine oil polluted soil

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Comparative enzyme kinetics of catalase and dehydrogenase under municipal waste and CaO treatments in spent engine oil polluted soil

Chike Anthony Nweze *, Onyemeziri Christopher Alisa, Ali Bilar, Stanley Chinonso Ukanero, Chizoba Vivian Nweze and Oluboyo Michael Babalola

Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, PMB 1526, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria.
 
Research Article
Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 14(01), 173-180
Article DOI: 10.30574/msarr.2025.14.1.0069
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2025.14.1.0069
Received on 13 April 2025; revised on 30 May 2025; accepted on 02 June 2025
This study investigates the comparative enzyme kinetics of catalase and dehydrogenase in spent engine oil (SEO)-polluted soil amended with municipal organic waste and calcium oxide (CaO). Using a Latin square design, contaminated soils were treated and monitored over 70 days. Enzyme kinetics were modeled via Michaelis-Menten and Lineweaver-Burk approaches, with kinetic parameters (Vmax and Km) determined at seven time points. On Day 1, dehydrogenase showed the lowest Km under municipal waste treatment (0.182 mM), indicating high substrate affinity, while CaO-treated soils exhibited the highest Km (0.645 mM). Vmax for dehydrogenase peaked on Day 14 in control (1.145 μg TPF g⁻¹ h⁻¹), followed by municipal waste (1.103) and CaO (0.860). Catalase exhibited lower Km values throughout the study, with early activity suppressed (Vmax ~0.076–0.086 μmol H₂O₂ min⁻¹ g⁻¹) but rising significantly by Day 42 (Vmax ~1.111 across treatments). Catalytic efficiency (Vmax/Km) revealed that municipal waste consistently enhanced enzyme activity, particularly in the early remediation phase. By Day 70, enzyme kinetics stabilized, with Km and Vmax values converging across treatments: dehydrogenase Km ~4.13 mM, Vmax ~0.71; catalase Km ~4.12 mM, Vmax ~0.71. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) among treatments at Day 70. These findings affirm that enzyme kinetics are reliable indicators of bioremediation efficiency and demonstrate that municipal waste, owing to its microbial and nutrient-rich profile, provides superior enhancement of enzymatic activity compared to CaO in remediating SEO-contaminated soils.
Enzyme kinetics; Catalase; Dehydrogenase; Soil remediation; Michaelis-Menten kinetics; Organic amendment; Lineweaver Bulk’s Model
 
https://msarr.magnascientiapub.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/MSARR-2025-…

Preview Article PDF

Chike Anthony Nweze, Onyemeziri Christopher Alisa, Ali Bilar, Stanley Chinonso Ukanero, Chizoba Vivian Nweze and Oluboyo Michael Babalola. Comparative enzyme kinetics of catalase and dehydrogenase under municipal waste and CaO treatments in spent engine oil polluted soil. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 14(1), 173-180. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2025.14.1.0069

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution