Home
Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews
Peer-Reviewed • ISSN: 2582-9394 • Fast-Track Publishing • Impact Factor 8.5 • Low Publication Charges • Crossref DOI Linking

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Research and review articles are invited for publication in September - October 2026 (Volume 18, Issue 1) Submit manuscript

Ablation vs antithyroid drugs vs thyroidectomy in Graves’ disease: A literature review

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Ablation vs antithyroid drugs vs thyroidectomy in Graves’ disease: A literature review

Vania Helsa Ardhani 1 and Hermawan Susanto 2, *

1 Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.
 
Review Article
Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 15(02), 248-253
Article DOI: 10.30574/msarr.2025.15.2.0147
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2025.15.2.0147
Received 11 November 2025; revised on 16 December 2025; accepted on 18 December 2025
Backgrounds: Graves' disease (GD) is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism, characterized by autoimmune stimulation of the thyroid gland. Long-term treatment options include antithyroid drugs (ATDs), radioactive iodine (RAI), and thyroidectomy, but there is no universal agreement on which treatment approach is best. Each modality has different benefits and limitations, making comparative evaluation is important to help guide individual treatment decisions.
Methods: This literature review summarizes evidence from clinical trials, meta-analyses, and observational studies evaluating the efficacy, recurrence rates, safety profiles, and long-term outcomes of antithyroid drugs (ATD), RAI, and thyroidectomy in the management of Graves’ disease. Databases such PubMed, SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, and references inside the extracted studies were used.
Results: ATDs remain the preferred first-line therapy in many regions due to their non-invasive approach and potential for remission, although 30–70% of patients relapse after discontinuation. Long-term low-dose therapy can reduce recurrence but requires monitoring for hepatotoxicity. RAI demonstrates high cure rates (>90%) and is cost-effective, but frequently results in permanent hypothyroidism and may worsen orbitopathy. Thyroidectomy provides the most definitive treatment, with a relapse rate about zero and rapid achievement of euthyroidism, although it carries risks such as recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypoparathyroidism. Comparative studies consistently show superior remission with surgery, followed by RAI, while ATDs have the highest recurrence.
Conclusions: Each treatment modality for GD offers distinct advantages and disadvantages. Thyroidectomy provides the most reliable cure, RAI offers effective and economical definitive therapy, and ATDs remain valuable first-line options. Optimal treatment selection should be individualized based on patient preference, comorbidities, and desired long-term outcomes.
Graves’ Disease; Hyperthyroidism; Antithyroid Drugs; Radioactive Iodine Therapy; Thyroidectomy
https://msarr.magnascientiapub.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/MSARR-2025-…

Preview Article PDF

Vania Helsa Ardhani and Hermawan Susanto. Ablation vs antithyroid drugs vs thyroidectomy in Graves’ disease: A literature review. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 15(2), 248-253 . Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2025.15.2.0147

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution